Discussion: The possibility that we live in a simulation is not just an existing fantasy in movies. It is dealt with by well-known scientists and philosophers. Is there a way to confirm or reject this strange possibility?

  1. Home
  2. FORUMS
  3. Innovative topics regarding science, aliens, and medicine.

The possibility that we live in a simulation is not just an existing fantasy in movies. It is dealt with by well-known scientists and philosophers. Is there a way to confirm or reject this strange possibility?

The premise is that all activities humans perform, including physiological processes, movement, thinking, emotions, memories, and even the hidden parts of the subconscious, have a mathematical expression. Otherwise, complete algorithms cannot be maintained. It is important to emphasize that proving or disproving this claim is impossible due to logical limitations known as Gödel's incompleteness theorems. Professor Nick Bostrom raised the possibility that we live in a simulation. However, we cannot prove whether we live in a simulation! The problem is insurmountable!

The idea that we live in a "computer simulation" seems ridiculous. After all, we feel pain; do we have free will? And we bleed when we are injured. Quite surprisingly, if we live in a (computerized) simulation, then issues in modern physics suddenly seem more straightforward to explain. A prominent example is Quantum Entanglement, which has no rational explanation other than the explanation of super-determinism, a simulation.


To prove or deny the computer simulation option, there are three options:

1. To prove that we live in a simulation, we must crack the simulation formula. This means we can consistently and accurately predict the future, time after time, without any possibility of intelligent statistical guessing. To rule out the possibility that we live in a simulation, we must show an evident mathematical impossibility. In both cases, science today cannot verify or negate the possibility of living in a simulation.

2 Another possibility is that aliens will come and reveal that we live in a simulation that governs nature.

3 The third option is not as unambiguous as the first two sentences and attempts to detect possible inconsistencies in the simulation. We start from the view that the simulation is dynamic but consistent; if we find an inconsistency, the probability that we do not live in the simulation increases. (The answer is not unequivocal.)

Link:
Deterministic human simulation—Pinnacle of scientific achievements.
https://www.sf-healing.com/page/245 (Copy & Paste)

May interest you:
Add New Post
WhatsApp
We use cookies to improve the user experience on the site. Learn moreI Agree