Prophecies of World War III frequently emerge. They are not the product of fantasy. The enormous military power and technological development are capable of dragging humanity to self-destruction, without anyone intending to do so. Events of a "near-war" have already occurred in the past, and fortunately, they ended without incident. The price of a malfunction is unimaginable. The premise is that no leader is interested in a military confrontation that could destroy humanity. Still, technological capabilities pose a terrible danger to humanity that must be prevented, at almost any cost.
Historical Near-Misses (Refresher by DeepSeek):
- Cuban Missile Crisis (1962): 13-day standoff; US blockade & Soviet submarines nearly armed with nuclear torpedoes. Avoided via back-channel diplomacy.
- Soviet False Alarm (1983): The early-warning system falsely detected US missiles. Officer Stanislav Petrov correctly dismissed it as a malfunction, averting retaliation.
- Norwegian Rocket Incident (1995): Russian radar mistook a US/Norwegian research rocket for a Trident missile. Boris Yeltsin activated the nuclear briefcase; the attack was aborted as the trajectory was clarified.
- Indo-Pakistani Kashmir Crisis (1999): The risk of a nuclear exchange during the Kargil War was averted through intense US diplomacy, which ultimately de-escalated the situation.
- Computer Glitches (Multiple): Numerous false alarms (US & USSR/Russia) due to technical errors, narrowly avoiding catastrophic decisions.
- 2008 Russo-Georgian War: Heightened tensions raised concerns about potential NATO-Russia confrontation.
In 2025
- The war between Russia and Ukraine is in its third year and is currently at an impasse for a ceasefire.
- A military confrontation between Pakistan and India ended in a ceasefire.
- There is a direct military confrontation between Iran and Israel, with fears of an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
The idea is to establish a situation room for military and security coordination to prevent escalation.
The situation room will coordinate to prevent military escalation, especially one that originates from an accident or reckless act. In the first stage, a situation room will be established between the United States and China, with a modular, rapidly expandable structure. I propose to uphold the following principles:
- The situation room will be subordinate to the head of state, the president of the United States, and the chairman of the Communist Party of China.
- Prohibition of decision-making for shooting, by artificial intelligence alone.
- Skilled staff, speaking the language of the other perfectly. Personal acquaintance between team members creates a trust-building atmosphere.
- Real-time technology connection to war rooms in various arenas, including land, sea, and air.
- The ability to intercept missiles or destroy them in flight.
- A protocol for making dramatic decisions in a team and not by individuals.
The establishment of a situation room is not supposed to be a political decision; it can be carried out discreetly between the heads of the superpowers, without public announcement, under the media radar. The budget of the situation room can be modular and starts with sums of a few hundred million dollars for each of the superpowers. Negligible sums concerning the enormous damage to life and property in the event of a malfunction.
The US-China (Potentially Russia+) "Situation Room": A Technical and Diplomatic Imperative
Partial quotes from DeepSeek AI, guided by my initiative.The Problem:
Humanity remains one misinterpretation, one technical glitch, or one uncontrolled escalation away from catastrophic nuclear conflict. Historical near-misses underscore the terrifying fragility of crisis management between nuclear powers. Existing hotlines and protocols are demonstrably insufficient in countering modern threats, such as cyber warfare, hypersonic missiles, and AI-enhanced decision-making cycles.
The Proposed Solution: A Joint Situation Room (JSR)
This concept envisions a permanent, ultra-secure facility staffed jointly by US and Chinese (later potentially Russian and other P5) military and diplomatic personnel, operating under absolute secrecy. Its sole mission is to prevent unintended or uncontrolled escalation into nuclear war.
Core Functions & Required Technologies:
-
Real-Time, Multi-Domain Awareness:
-
Technology: Secure quantum-encrypted data links integrating US & Chinese early-warning satellites (SBIRS, DSP analogs), ground-based radar, submarine detection networks, cyber-intrusion alerts, and intelligence feeds.
-
Challenge: Overcoming deep mutual distrust to share sensitive data streams without compromising sources/methods. Requires unprecedented transparency protocols.
-
-
De-Escalation & Communication Hub:
-
Technology: Redundant, ultra-secure communication channels (quantum key distribution, dedicated fiber) bypassing normal diplomatic/political channels. Advanced translation/AI for real-time, nuance-preserving communication.
-
Challenge: Ensuring instant, unambiguous communication between JSR staff and national command authorities during crises.
-
-
Escalation Interdiction Capability (Highly Controversial & Advanced):
-
Technology: Potential integration with systems capable of neutralizing weapons in extremis. It could theoretically involve:
-
Cyber/Electronic Warfare: Capabilities to disrupt missile guidance or launch systems of either side if the catastrophic accidental launch is confirmed.
-
Kinetic Intercept (Hypothetical): Jointly controlled point-defense systems (lasers, railguns, interceptor missiles) positioned to neutralize a verified accidental or unauthorized launch threatening either homeland.
-
-
Massive Challenge: Requires unimaginable levels of mutual trust and technological integration. Raises critical questions of sovereignty, reliability, and potential vulnerability.
-
-
AI as an Enabler, NOT a Decider:
-
Technology: Advanced AI for data fusion (identifying patterns from vast sensor inputs), predictive analysis (modeling escalation paths), simulation, and translation. Crucially, AI must be advisory only.
-
Imperative: Human operators MUST retain absolute, unambiguous control over any interdiction decision. "Man-in-the-loop" protocols are non-negotiable to prevent AI-driven accidental war. Cultural understanding by human staff is paramount for interpreting intent.
-
Why US-China First?
-
They represent the most consequential bilateral relationship, defining global stability.
-
Strategic rivalry is intense, with multiple potential flashpoints (Taiwan, South China Sea, tech competition).
-
Establishing a framework between these two is the most significant step; adding others (Russia, UK, France) becomes more feasible later.
Predicted Challenges and Hurdles:
- Deep Mutual Distrust: Decades of strategic competition, espionage, and ideological differences create a massive trust deficit.
- Sovereignty Concerns: Granting another power (especially an adversary) any insight, let alone potential influence, over nuclear command/control is anathema to current doctrine.
- Technological Feasibility and Secrecy: Developing and integrating the required neutralization tech is likely decades away and would be among the world's most closely guarded secrets. Maintaining total project secrecy is daunting.
- Political Will: Requires sustained commitment from leadership willing to defy hardliners and prioritize existential risk over short-term advantage. Secrecy is necessary to shield it from domestic political pressure and media scrutiny.
- Verification and Control: How to verify compliance? How to ensure neither side can unilaterally hijack or turn off the JSR's defensive capabilities?
- Defining "Accidental/Unauthorized": Establishing clear, mutually agreed-upon triggers for JSR intervention is politically and technically fraught.
Why It's Necessary (Despite the Challenges):
- The historical record proves that luck is not a strategy. As weapons become faster, stealthier, and more numerous, and decision windows become increasingly narrow, the risk of a catastrophic mistake grows exponentially. Cyber threats add a new layer of vulnerability. The JSR concept, although immensely challenging, represents a proactive attempt to break the cycle of mutual assured destruction (MAD) by establishing mechanisms for mutual assured survival. It shifts the focus from winning a war to preventing one that neither side truly wants to fight.
Conclusion for Publication:
- The proposed US-China Joint Situation Room is not a naive dream of peace; it's a hard-nosed, technologically daunting, and politically explosive necessity born from the cold logic of nuclear deterrence in the 21st century. It acknowledges that the greatest threat may not be intentional aggression, but a cascade of errors, misperceptions, or technological failures that outpace human judgment. While the barriers – especially trust and the revolutionary technology required for interdiction – are monumental, the cost of failure is extinction. Starting this dialogue, however discreetly, is not just helpful; it's an imperative for human survival. Publishing this concept challenges leaders to confront the uncomfortable truth that absolute national sovereignty is incompatible with absolute security in the nuclear age. It pushes the boundaries of what's considered possible to prevent the ultimate catastrophe.
